0x23147baa2314…23147ba7
Abraxas-Linked Hyperliquid Addresses Show $118M in Open Gains
Two Hyperliquid addresses linked to Abraxas Capital showed $118 million in combined unrealized profit on Nov. 11, including $34.98 million from open Zcash shorts as ZEC traded below $1,000.

Outputs
A Nov. 11 snapshot showed $34.98 million in unrealized profit on Zcash shorts held by two Hyperliquid addresses linked to Abraxas Capital.
The two addresses held $118 million in combined unrealized profit across open positions on Nov. 11.
ZEC traded below $1,000 in the Nov. 11 snapshot.
A Nov. 8 snapshot valued Abraxas Capital’s Hyperliquid positions at $451.85 million, nearly all short, with $30.77 million in unrealized profit.
The ZEC short gains remained unrealized and did not represent profit locked in through closing trades.
Two Hyperliquid addresses linked to Abraxas Capital held $118 million in combined unrealized profit across open positions in a Nov. 11 snapshot, including $34.98 million on Zcash (ZEC) shorts.
The Zcash gain coincided with ZEC falling below $1,000. It remained an open-position mark, not cash realized through a closing trade. The distinction matters: the reported $34.98 million measured short positions at the snapshot price, while the available data did not record proceeds from closing them.
The broader Nov. 11 reading covered both addresses’ open positions and placed their combined unrealized profit at $118 million. Zcash accounted for roughly 29.6% of that total; the arithmetic remainder attributable to all other open positions was $83.02 million. The figures do not identify those other assets, individual position sizes or the gains attached to each one.
Three days earlier, a Nov. 8 snapshot valued Abraxas Capital’s Hyperliquid positions at $451.85 million and showed nearly all positions short. It also showed $30.77 million in unrealized profit.
The difference between the reported aggregate profit figures was $87.23 million, with the Nov. 11 total about 3.8 times the Nov. 8 level. The snapshots do not separate the contribution of price changes from changes in positions.
Numerically, the $34.98 million in open Zcash gains on Nov. 11 exceeded the entire $30.77 million unrealized profit reported across the nearly all-short position set on Nov. 8 by $4.21 million. The comparison does not establish that the same positions produced both readings; it illustrates how the marked value of a large short book can change over three days.
A large short position set can show rapid changes in marked profit when the underlying prices move. The $118 million reading therefore describes exposure at a point in time, not a fixed balance or a return already available to the linked addresses. Without execution data, the snapshots cannot distinguish any proceeds from closed positions from gains later reversed before closure.
The two observations are snapshots rather than a transaction history. The $87.23 million difference cannot be assigned solely to ZEC because the Nov. 11 aggregate covered other open positions. It also cannot be treated as a realized gain. The available records provide no closing prices, execution records, collateral movements or transfers.
What does this change for Hyperliquid traders?
For traders, the useful information is the scale and short bias of the reported exposure, not a claim that Abraxas Capital banked $118 million. The linked addresses carried substantial short exposure, and the ZEC gain depended on a price move against those positions. ZEC trading below $1,000 was the condition attached to the reported Zcash gain.
The snapshots do not disclose entry prices, leverage, collateral, liquidation thresholds, funding costs or closing activity. Those omissions limit any conclusion about realized profitability, downside exposure or the addresses’ remaining capacity to hold the positions.
Nor do the snapshots, on their own, establish beneficial ownership of each address or explain whether positions were opened, hedged or adjusted between Nov. 8 and Nov. 11. The reporting identifies only a linkage between Abraxas Capital and the addresses, so any stronger claim would exceed the available position data.
The operational consequence is a wide gap between open marks and cash returns. The Nov. 11 $118 million figure can fall if ZEC and the other short positions rebound, and it can disappear if positions close at worse levels.
The Nov. 8 $451.85 million position value likewise describes exposure at one snapshot, not capital permanently committed or profit withdrawable without closing the trades.
Market participants should therefore treat the $34.98 million as a marked gain tied to open exposure rather than a realized windfall. The next dated Hyperliquid snapshot, or evidence that the positions have closed, will show whether the $118 million open-profit figure persists or converts into realized proceeds.
via tokenpost.com (Source)
More from Nathan Brooks
Show full bio
Market editor covering money, funding and market shifts around crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.
956 articles