0x20c0ff7020c0…20c0ff73

ConfirmedInfrastructure621 vB18 sat/vB3 min decode

Akash Opens Two-Year One-Way Bridge for AKT From Cosmos to Solana

Akash opened a two-year, one-way portal Nov. 12 for 1:1 AKT transfers from Cosmos to Solana, with staked tokens subject to a 21-day unbonding wait before moving.

Akash Opens Two-Year, One-Way Portal for 1:1 AKT Transfers to Solana
WitnessAkash Opens Two-Year, One-Way Portal for 1:1 AKT Transfers to Solanageralt / pixabay

Outputs

  1. Akash opened a two-year, one-way transfer portal on Nov. 12 for 1:1 AKT moves from Cosmos to Solana.

  2. Stakers approved the AKT move to Solana on Nov. 2; two audits were planned with a 30-day window to publish reports, still unpublished as of Nov. 13.

  3. Staked AKT requires a 21-day unbonding period before transfer; Cosmos staking rewards continue until a later cutover.

  4. The compute marketplace stays on Cosmos and needs a separate cutover vote; already-transferred AKT will not count in that vote.

  5. Founder Greg Osuri said Solana staking would not launch for a few months.

Akash Network opened a two-year transfer portal on Nov. 12 that lets holders move its native AKT token one way from Akash's Cosmos chain to Solana at a ratio of one to one. The mechanism locks each holder's AKT on the Cosmos side while an equal amount is minted on Solana. Once executed, the transfer cannot be reversed.

The launch follows governance approval. Akash stakers voted on Nov. 2 to authorize the move of AKT to Solana, clearing the way for the portal's deployment ten days later. Akash's plan required two independent audits before launch and gives the project a 30-day window to publish the audit reports. As of Nov. 13, neither report had been made public — a gap practitioners will want to watch, since the audit terms are part of the approved plan itself.

What does the portal actually change for holders?

The mechanics are simple on the surface and consequential in detail. A holder who transfers does not receive a wrapped asset in the usual sense of a two-way bridge with redemption rights; the portal is explicitly one-directional. AKT is locked on Cosmos and an equal quantity is created on Solana, with no route back through this channel. That design removes bridge-return risk but also forecloses any reversal if a holder changes position.

For staked tokens, the friction is operational. Holders must unstake their AKT and wait out Cosmos's 21-day unbonding period before they can transfer through the portal. That is three full weeks of illiquidity between the decision to move and the ability to execute it — a scheduling constraint anyone running validators, delegations or treasury positions should build into their planning now rather than at the end of the two-year window.

What stays behind on Cosmos?

The portal moves only the token. Akash's compute marketplace — the core business of the protocol — remains on Cosmos and requires a separate cutover vote to relocate. That vote will take place on Cosmos, and there is a critical wrinkle: AKT already transferred to Solana will not count toward it. In practical terms, holders who move early give up their voting weight in the decision that matters most, the one determining whether the marketplace itself follows the token.

Cosmos staking rewards will continue until the later cutover, so remaining on Cosmos is not immediately penalized. On the Solana side, staking is further out. Akash founder Greg Osuri said Solana staking would not launch for a few months, meaning transferred AKT will sit unstaked and unproductive on Solana in the interim.

An existing route, now with a companion

AKT was already reachable on Solana through Sunrise, a separate path that predates the portal. The distinction matters for anyone tracing supply or choosing a route: Sunrise serves transfers that do not originate on Akash's Cosmos chain, while the new portal exists specifically for native Cosmos-chain AKT. Two channels, two origins, one destination.

The window and what follows

The portal's two-year window is now open, which converts what could have been a rushed migration into a scheduled one. Holders face a real sequencing decision rather than a deadline panic: transfer early and forfeit cutover-vote participation plus months of Solana staking yield, or stay staked on Cosmos, keep rewards and voting power, and wait for the marketplace question to resolve.

The next concrete milestones for practitioners are threefold: publication of the two audit reports within the 30-day disclosure window, the launch of Solana staking in the coming months, and the separate Cosmos-based cutover vote on moving the compute marketplace. Until that vote passes, Akash remains operationally a Cosmos protocol with a Solana-denominated token growing alongside it.

via tokenpost.com (Source)

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

Market editor covering money, funding and market shifts around crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.

1,133 articles