0x61e5a95f61e5…61e5a95c
China's $176B Crypto Activity Now 59% P2P, Chainalysis Finds
Chainalysis estimates China generated at least $176 billion in crypto activity through June 2026, with 59.1% moving through P2P transfers. Sub-$1,000 stablecoin transfers rose over 1,000% year-on-year.

Outputs
China generated at least $176 billion in crypto activity in the 12 months through June 2026, with 59.1% conducted via domestic P2P transfers (Chainalysis)
Monthly new stablecoin activity rose from roughly $240 million in March 2025 to nearly $5 billion about a year later
Stablecoin transfers under $1,000 grew by roughly 1,000% between March 2025 and early 2026
China-attributed stablecoin wallets turned over holdings at 33.2x annually, versus a 9.3x global benchmark
China-attributed wallets held an average of $3.1 billion in stablecoins but transferred $104.1 billion across 18.1 million transactions
China generated at least $176 billion in crypto activity over the 12 months through June 2026, with 59.1% moving through domestic peer-to-peer transfers rather than exchanges or other centralized platforms, according to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis.
That P2P share is 3.5 times higher than in the previous reporting period, marking an unusual divergence from most major crypto markets, where exchanges remain the primary entry and exit point for users. Chainalysis published the figures in its Eastern Asia Crypto Adoption report.
What does the P2P share signal about Beijing's enforcement?
The data points to a structural retreat from regulated venues inside China, where authorities have restricted crypto trading since 2017 and barred domestic exchanges from operating in renminbi.
Domestic stablecoin payment activity began accelerating around March 2025 and continued expanding for 13 consecutive month-over-month periods, according to Chainalysis.
The firm tied part of the shift to Beijing's March 2025 expansion of its social-credit framework into financial services and online activity. Users whose access to conventional finance had been restricted could turn to crypto, Chainalysis said, while others may rely on stablecoins to settle outside monitored rails.
Chainalysis described that explanation as a working hypothesis rather than evidence of causation. Blockchain data can show when and how assets move but cannot establish why an individual chose one payment method over another.
How fast has stablecoin use grown inside China?
Growth in monthly new stablecoin activity rose from roughly $240 million in March 2025 to almost $5 billion about a year later. Increases were concentrated in transaction sizes consistent with individuals and smaller businesses rather than solely large institutional transfers.
- Sub-$100 transfers: +996%
- $100–$1,000 transfers: +1,057%
- $1,000–$10,000 transfers: +1,321%
The figures indicate a broad-based migration toward wallet-to-wallet settlement inside the country.
Why does the turnover ratio matter?
Annual turnover of self-custodied stablecoin holdings in China-attributed wallets reached 33.2 times during the period, more than triple the global benchmark of 9.3 times and above every regional peer Chainalysis tracked.
- Japan: 9.9x
- Hong Kong: 6.1x
- South Korea: 5.1x
- Taiwan: 3.5x
China-attributed wallets held an average of about $3.1 billion in stablecoins but transferred $104.1 billion across 18.1 million transactions. The same pool of tokens was repeatedly returned to circulation rather than remaining dormant.
High turnover is consistent with stablecoins functioning as working capital or settlement assets, a pattern that could emerge as tokens develop into a domestic payment rail, Chainalysis said.
What challenges does this create for stablecoin issuers and regulators?
Restrictions on exchanges can limit formal market access, but self-custodied dollar tokens can still circulate through decentralized networks and private transfers. That creates a structural enforcement gap for Beijing.
For issuers and service providers, China represents a large potential source of demand that remains difficult to serve directly because of regulatory restrictions. Growth may continue through offshore platforms, OTC networks and self-custody rather than conventional consumer-facing businesses, Chainalysis suggested.
The question now is whether the trend continues as Chinese authorities expand oversight of digital payments and financial activity. If smaller stablecoin transfers keep rising alongside elevated wallet turnover, regulators may face a growing pool of dollar-linked value circulating beyond the exchange infrastructure the earlier restrictions were designed to constrain.
via chainalysis.com (Original)