0x30eea33130ee…30eea334
DTCC to Bring Tokenized Securities to Solana in 2027
DTCC will connect its tokenization service to Solana in H2 2027, but a December 2025 SEC no-action letter restricts token transfers to registered wallets, capping near-term adoption.

Outputs
DTCC plans to connect its tokenization service to Solana in the second half of 2027
A December 2025 SEC no-action letter restricts tokenized securities to wallets registered with DTC participants
Tokenized-stock trading volume on Solana hit about $4.9 billion in H1 2026, six times the prior period
20 DTC participants signed agreements to access DTCC's tokenization service at its Oct. 28 launch
Solana transactions fell nearly 40% to 6.9 billion in the 30 days ending Nov. 11
The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation plans to connect its tokenization service to Solana in the second half of 2027, a move that would let certain securities held by its Depository Trust Company subsidiary be issued as digital tokens on the network. DTCC announced the plan Thursday, extending a service it first launched on the Canton Network and its private Besu network on Oct. 28.
The expansion could pull more traditional financial institutions onto Solana, but analysts say its near-term impact is capped by US rules. Under a December 2025 SEC no-action letter, DTC participants must register wallets to hold tokenized securities, and tokens can only move between registered wallets — a constraint that keeps permissionless retail and DeFi liquidity outside the system.
What did memecoins have to do with it?
Solana built its throughput reputation on high-volume crypto trading, particularly memecoins, and that history may have functioned as proof of concept for institutional workloads. The network held about $4.94 billion in total value locked as of Nov. 12, according to DefiLlama.
"Memes were a public stress test that gave Solana credibility that it can handle retail-scale volume cheaply and reliably," Alex Lin, founding partner at venture firm Reforge, told Cointelegraph. "The casino paved the way for more institutional plumbing."
Lin was blunt about the regulatory ceiling. "It's overstated in the near term because the SEC relief from Dec 2025 keeps these tokens in a walled garden of registered DTC participants, so permissionless retail and DeFi liquidity can't touch these tokens directly yet," he said. "Regulators need to let these assets work as true onchain collateral and that's more policy than tech."
At the October launch of its tokenization service, DTCC said 20 DTC participants had signed agreements to access it. It has not said whether any of them plan to use Solana. Cointelegraph contacted DTCC and the Solana Foundation for comment without receiving a response by publication.
Is Solana's tokenized-asset market already growing?
Demand for tokenized stocks on Solana exists without DTCC. Birdeye, a blockchain analytics platform tracking activity on the network, reported roughly $4.9 billion in tokenized-stock trading volume in the first half of 2026 — more than six times the prior six months. Its third-quarter report found more than 1 million accounts held tokenized stocks on Solana by late September.
"By late September more than a million wallets had held a tokenized stock, and real-world assets on Solana had grown five times in a year," Birdeye CEO and co-founder Kha Nguyen told Cointelegraph.
The broader picture is softer. Solana recorded about 6.9 billion transactions in the 30 days ending Nov. 11, down almost 40% from the previous period, per Token Terminal. DEX trading volume fell 34.4% to $39.1 billion, monthly active addresses dropped nearly 13% to 45.8 million, and network fees declined 39% to about $17 million. Against that slide, the value of tokenized real-world assets on Solana rose almost 7% to $4.76 billion as of Nov. 11, up from $4.46 billion on Oct. 12.
Does more issuance mean more activity?
Not automatically, Nguyen cautioned. Issuing tokenized securities on Solana does not guarantee more transactions or demand for SOL. "A trade is one transaction whether it moves $100 or $100 million," he said. "What matters is turnover, not value parked on-chain."
Real impact, he argued, requires banks, brokers and issuers to commit — and follow through. "Banks, brokers and issuers need to say they will issue, trade and settle there, and then do it," Nguyen said. He added that the assets must be "active, not idle: traded around the clock, used as collateral to borrow against, and earning yield."
Lin agreed the venue of issuance matters less than where the assets circulate. "No one cares where the assets are issued, but more so where they're used," he said. "It's all about where secondary trading and collateral activity will happen and ultimately settle."
The 2027 timeline leaves a long runway for policy to change. Whether the SEC's wallet-registration framework loosens before then — or institutional participants commit to using Solana rather than simply holding tokens — will determine if the integration moves real settlement volume or leaves it parked.
via sec.gov (Original)
More from Daniel Okafor
Show full bio
Correspondent covering people, launches and day-to-day practice in crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.
1,050 articles