0x1088ae321088…1088ae2f

ConfirmedStablecoins—168 sat/vB

Ether.fi to Launch Branded Stablecoin on Ethena's Whitelabel Platform

Ether.fi will issue a branded stablecoin on Ethena's Whitelabel platform, sharing revenue while Ethena handles issuance, custody and reserves. Terms and backing mix remain undisclosed.

Outputs

  1. Ether.fi will launch a branded stablecoin on Ethena's Whitelabel Stablecoin-as-a-Service platform.

  2. Ethena's USDe supply stands at roughly $4.9 billion, down from a 2025 peak of about $14.8 billion.

  3. The whitelabel platform, public since around September 2025, previously powered Jupiter's jupUSD and MegaETH's USDm.

  4. Ether.fi and Ethena first partnered in September 2024 on USDe deposits for liquid restaking tokens.

  5. The token's name, launch date, backing mix and revenue split remain undisclosed.

Ether.fi, the liquid staking protocol, will issue its own branded stablecoin built on Ethena's Whitelabel Stablecoin-as-a-Service platform, becoming the latest crypto project to mint a proprietary dollar token rather than integrate a third-party one.

Ethena's whitelabel platform, which gained public traction around September 2025, handles the operational machinery behind a branded dollar: issuance, backing management, custody, reserves and liquidity integrations. Ether.fi retains the brand and the direct user relationship, while Ethena runs the plumbing that keeps the token pegged and redeemable. The arrangement also lets Ether.fi share in the revenue the stablecoin generates.

Neither protocol has confirmed the token's name, launch timeline, backing mix or revenue split.

How does the Ethena whitelabel model work?

The service lets a protocol issue and manage a dollar-denominated token under its own name. Ethena offers two main backing options for clients.

  • USDe, Ethena's synthetic dollar, with a current supply of roughly $4.9 billion — well below its 2025 peak of approximately $14.8 billion.
  • USDtb, which Ethena describes as GENIUS-compliant and backs with traditional assets such as US dollars, drawing on strategic partnerships including BlackRock for liquidity.

The platform has a short but notable client roster. Jupiter launched jupUSD on Solana through the service, and MegaETH rolled out USDm the same way. An Ether.fi token would be the third publicly known deployment.

Is this the first Ether.fi–Ethena deal?

No. In September 2024 the two protocols announced a partnership that let users deposit USDe on Ether.fi in exchange for liquid restaking tokens. That deal plugged Ethena's dollar into Ether.fi's staking products. The new arrangement goes further: it places Ethena's infrastructure underneath a dollar that carries Ether.fi's name.

The move also tracks a broader strategic shift at Ether.fi. The protocol built its reputation in liquid staking but has been expanding into neobank-style consumer products, and a tailored dollar asset could tie staking, DeFi activity and consumer-facing financial services into one ecosystem.

For Ethena, each new whitelabel client extends the reach of its backing assets. If Ether.fi's stablecoin leans on USDe or USDtb, it creates fresh demand for Ethena's core products at a moment when USDe supply sits far below its 2025 high-water mark.

What are the open questions?

Several commercial and risk details remain undisclosed. The economic terms, including how revenue will be divided between the two protocols, have not been made public.

The backing choice carries consequences for users. Synthetic dollars like USDe have mechanics and stress points that differ from fully fiat-backed tokens. How Ether.fi weights USDe versus USDtb will shape the risk profile its users actually assume — a decision the protocol has not yet announced.

There is also a market-structure consideration. As jupUSD, USDm and now a potential Ether.fi dollar enter circulation, liquidity risks spreading across many similar tokens rather than pooling in a few deep, efficient ones.

The specifics to watch going forward are the token's name, its backing composition, its launch date and the revenue-sharing terms between the two protocols — none of which had been disclosed at publication time.

via Crypto Briefing (Source)

More from Nathan Brooks

Nathan Brooks

Show full bio

Market editor covering business strategy at Mempool Brief.

451 articles