0x6ffeba746ffe…6ffeba77
Initia Halts Layer 1 After $615,000 in Unauthorized Transfers
Initia paused its Layer 1 after forged IBC transfers moved about $605,000 in USDC and $10,000 in other tokens. Most assets remained on the halted chain; the transfers do not establish final losses.

Outputs
Initia halted its Layer 1 at 1:18 a.m. ET (06:18 UTC) on Nov. 10.
About $605,000 in USDC and roughly $10,000 in other tokens left a custody account; the USDC moved through Noble.
Compromised Rollup infrastructure keys reportedly enabled forged IBC transfers.
Most remaining assets stayed on the halted Layer 1; reported transfers do not establish total losses.
INIT rose 80% over 24 hours to $0.234 on Nov. 10 while the network remained halted.
By Elena Vasquez
Initia halted its Layer 1 at 1:18 a.m. ET (06:18 UTC) on Nov. 10 after about $605,000 in USDC and roughly $10,000 in other tokens left a custody account. The project attributed the unauthorized movement to forged Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) transfers, based on a preliminary investigation.
Initia coordinated the pause with validators and described the halt as “a protective measure.” The immediate consequence is a paused chain, not a published recovery plan.
How did the unauthorized transfers occur?
Initia said its preliminary investigation found that “compromised keys tied to Rollup infrastructure were used to forge Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) transfers.” The disclosure does not explain how the keys were obtained or how the forged transfers bypassed controls.
That account held assets bridged to Initia from multiple rollups. Initia did not publish the compromised key identifiers, transaction hashes or a completed forensic report, so the public account of the attack remains preliminary.
The halt stopped activity on Initia's Layer 1, where most remaining assets sat. It does not by itself establish that funds already transferred through Noble have been recovered. The stated cause is compromised keys, but the evidence has not yet been published.
How much left the custody account?
Initia reported that about $605,000 in USDC moved out through Noble before the halt. Roughly $10,000 in other tokens also left the account, putting the combined reported transfers at approximately $615,000.
More than 98% of that amount consisted of USDC; other tokens represented the remainder. Initia said most of the remaining assets stayed on the halted Layer 1, although the disclosure did not state their aggregate dollar value.
The report cautioned that the figures describe funds that moved and do not establish the total value of losses. The figures therefore track outbound movement, not a final accounting of what users or the project ultimately lost. The disclosed numbers establish movement, not a final loss, and most assets remain on the paused network.
Why did INIT gain while the chain was halted?
INIT climbed 80% over 24 hours on Nov. 10, reaching $0.234 after moving above $0.23 during that period. The source report described the token as one of the day's leading crypto gainers even as the Layer 1 remained offline following the unauthorized transfers.
The price move does not demonstrate restored access, a completed investigation or a resumption timetable. The report offers no link between the gain and any of those operational developments, and most of the custody account's remaining assets still sat on the paused chain. The token gained ground without any documented operational recovery.
What has to happen before the Layer 1 resumes?
The immediate test is whether Initia can replace the compromised Rollup infrastructure keys, prevent forged IBC transfers from recurring and restore Layer 1 operations without exposing more assets. Initia has not published a resumption deadline, a recovery plan or a quantified loss estimate.
No law-enforcement investigation, regulatory review, court process or insurance response appears in the disclosure. Those omissions do not prove that no response exists; the project's account remains the only named source. Until Initia documents key replacement and a resumption date, the Layer 1 pause has no announced end.
via tokenpost.com (Source)
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.
948 articles