0x58f96a3358f9…58f96a36
Nomura Weighs Laser Digital Sale After ¥7.4 Billion Loss
Nomura is considering selling Zurich-based Laser Digital after the unit became a key factor in a ¥7.4 billion European loss, with Marex Group evaluating a potential deal.

Outputs
Bloomberg reported on November 12 that Nomura Holdings is considering selling Laser Digital.
Nomura recently held talks with potential buyers, including Marex Group, which remains in the evaluation stage.
Laser Digital, founded in 2022 and based in Zurich, was a key factor behind a ¥7.4 billion European-business loss last quarter.
No final sale decision has been made, and Nomura could still retain Laser Digital.
Nomura has said it plans to reduce risk tied to cryptocurrency price volatility.
By Nathan Brooks
Nomura Holdings Inc. is considering the sale of cryptocurrency subsidiary Laser Digital after the Zurich-based unit became a key factor in a ¥7.4 billion loss in Nomura’s European business, Bloomberg reported on November 12.
The reported process has three basic parameters:
- Buyer outreach: Nomura recently held talks with potential buyers, including financial services firm Marex Group.
- Marex status: Marex is still evaluating whether to pursue a deal and has not committed to a transaction.
- Decision status: No final decision has been made, and Nomura could still retain Laser Digital.
Laser Digital was founded in 2022 and is based in Zurich, Switzerland. Bloomberg cited the unit as a key factor behind Nomura’s loss rather than presenting ¥7.4 billion as a disclosed standalone loss for Laser Digital. The source does not itemize the subsidiary’s contribution.
For scale, ¥7.4 billion over a three-month quarter equals roughly ¥2.47 billion per month on a simple division, although the report does not show whether the losses were concentrated in particular weeks or days. The period figure should not be read as an annualized run rate.
Bloomberg said the sale discussions came after Laser Digital suffered substantial losses during sharp swings in the cryptocurrency market. That places market volatility in the unit’s operating history and makes Nomura’s stated risk objective directly relevant to whether the group retains ownership.
Nomura has said it plans to reduce risk tied to cryptocurrency price volatility. A completed sale would place Laser Digital under different ownership, but the source does not establish that outcome; a retention decision would leave the subsidiary within Nomura. The strategic direction is clearer than the transaction.
CEO Kentaro Okuda highlighted Laser Digital last year as part of Nomura’s effort to capture future growth opportunities. Bloomberg characterized the potential sale as a setback for Okuda, underscoring the tension between that growth mandate and the unit’s exposure to sharp cryptocurrency price swings.
What does the possible sale change for clients and market participants?
For institutional clients and market participants, the immediate issue is ownership and risk allocation, not a confirmed operating change. The report identifies no transaction price, buyer commitment, completion date, regulatory approval, service perimeter, staffing plan or treatment of client contracts.
Until those points are disclosed, the talks do not establish that Laser Digital’s services or market access will end, move or change. If Nomura retains the subsidiary, the immediate implication is continuity of ownership during a strategic reassessment. If Marex or another buyer takes control, the corporate owner would change, but the source does not specify any operating effect.
The absence of a deadline is material. Marex is still evaluating whether to pursue a deal, and Nomura has not selected a course. Counterparties therefore cannot treat the discussions as a completed transfer or as evidence that Nomura has abandoned the business.
For Nomura, the decision pits a stated reduction in crypto risk against the strategic rationale assigned to Laser Digital by CEO Kentaro Okuda. The evidence available to outside readers is the ¥7.4 billion European-business loss and Bloomberg’s description of substantial subsidiary losses, not a full set of unit-level accounts.
The next verifiable checkpoint is a disclosure from Nomura or Marex on a transaction, its terms or a decision to retain the unit. Until then, no dated ownership or service-continuity change can be assumed.
via en.bloomingbit.io (Source)
More from Nathan Brooks
Show full bio
Market editor covering money, funding and market shifts around crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.
1,008 articles