0x5bf871095bf8…5bf8710c
Stacks Bond 2 Enrolled 505 BTC and Paid 1.21 BTC in Rewards
Stacks’ second Bitcoin bond enrolled 505 BTC and paid 1.21 BTC in rewards. The six-month PoX-5 cycle also drew 6.7 million STX, raising questions about its 3% target.

Outputs
Bond 2 enrolled 505 BTC and filled its roughly 500 BTC capacity by Oct. 12.
The six-month bond paid 1.21 BTC, distributed weekly in BTC from miners’ earnings, and targeted about 3% annualized yield.
Participants committed more than 6.7 million STX, worth about 5% of the BTC they staked.
Stacking DAO’s stBTC supplied about 483 BTC, roughly 96% of Bond 2’s enrollment.
PoX-5 went live on July 30; total STX staked rose from 392 million to 493 million.
Stacks’ second Bitcoin staking bond enrolled 505 BTC and paid 1.21 BTC in rewards, according to on-chain figures for the project’s PoX-5 cycle. Bond 2 reached its roughly 500 BTC capacity by Oct. 12, while participants committed more than 6.7 million STX alongside the bitcoin.
The six-month bonds target an annualized yield of about 3%, with rewards distributed weekly in BTC from Stacks miners’ earnings. Participants commit STX equal in value to roughly 5% of the BTC they stake, equivalent to about one-fifth of the deposited bitcoin by value. The stated yield remains a target rather than a guaranteed return.
How concentrated was the enrollment?
Stacking DAO’s stBTC liquid-staking product supplied about 483 BTC, or roughly 96% of Bond 2’s enrollment. An Xverse pool also helped draw participants, although the source provides no separate figure for that contribution. The reported funding mix depends heavily on stBTC, and the Xverse contribution cannot be independently sized from the figures provided.
The 483 BTC figure measures pooled asset exposure, not the number of participating wallets. Without wallet counts or holder distribution, the source cannot show whether participation was broad or concentrated among a smaller group.
What does the payout reveal about the yield?
The 1.21 BTC reward equals approximately 0.24% of the 505 BTC enrolled, using the disclosed figures. If that payout covers the full six-month term, a simple annualization would put it below 0.5%, not the approximately 3% target; the source does not establish that the payout, target and reward base cover identical periods or components.
A full reconciliation would require reward and timing data beyond the source. In plain terms, the headline payout does not prove that investors earned the stated annualized yield.
What can holders do with stBTC?
Holders of stBTC can continue earning bond rewards while using their positions in Stacks decentralized-finance applications. The cited example is borrowing USDC on Zest Protocol without unstaking the BTC, allowing a participant to retain the bond position while obtaining USDC liquidity.
That example links the reward position to a usable loan asset, so participants need not unstake BTC to access USDC. The source does not disclose collateral ratios, borrowing limits, liquidation terms or price risks, so liquidity is available but the strategy’s full risk cannot be assessed from the figures provided.
Did broader staking activity increase?
The first two bonding periods attracted about 735 BTC combined, with Bond 2 contributing 505 BTC, or nearly 69% of that total. The second period therefore supplied most of the early PoX-5 enrollment.
The first period contributed roughly 230 BTC by subtraction. The source gives no participant count, so the figures establish asset volume rather than the breadth of participation.
PoX-5 went live on July 30, after which total STX staked rose from 392 million to 493 million. That increase amounts to 101 million tokens, or more than 25%, although the source does not provide an exact measurement date for the endpoint. The clearest activity signal is the token increase, not a single bond figure in isolation.
Will more capacity follow?
Stacks founder Muneeb Ali said the on-chain staking mechanism was “working as intended.” He also indicated that future cycles may offer more capacity, but provided no timetable, target amount or conditions for such an increase.
Any additional capacity would also sit within a reward system funded by miners’ earnings, making the sustainability of a larger cycle relevant to future bond terms. The next verifiable market-structure test is whether capacity expands and whether a subsequent bond discloses enough data to reconcile realized BTC rewards with the roughly 3% annualized target.
via tokenpost.com (Source)
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Staff writer covering regulation, policy and their impact on crypto and web3 industry at Mempool Brief.
1,016 articles