0x5eac8f475eac…5eac8f44

ConfirmedSecurity530 vB171 sat/vB3 min decode

Three DeFi Exploits Drain $11.1M From Bridges and a Casino

Three DeFi protocols lost a combined $11.1M on September 25, 2026, as Payy Network, Duelbits, and Meter.io suffered separate bridge and private key exploits within hours of one another.

DeFi hack attack: Three exploits snatch $11M in a single day - Protos | Informed crypto news
WitnessDeFi hack attack: Three exploits snatch $11M in a single day - Protos | Informed crypto newsAI-generated

Outputs

  1. Three DeFi protocols lost a combined $11.1M to separate exploits on September 25, 2026

  2. Payy Network lost $1.8M when its Ethereum bridge was drained by an attacker funded via privacy protocol Railgun

  3. Crypto casino Duelbits lost approximately $7M in a suspected private key compromise, its second key-management failure since a $4.6M 2024 incident

  4. Meter.io's attacker minted $2.3M in unbacked tokens via a block validation flaw, crashing MTR ~80% and MTRG ~75% after sales on PancakeSwap

Three DeFi protocols lost a combined $11.1 million to separate exploits on Thursday, September 25, 2026, as attackers hit payroll-focused rollup Payy Network, crypto casino Duelbits, and EVM-compatible chain Meter.io within hours of one another. The cluster marks one of the most concentrated single-day loss events in DeFi since 2025, and it arrived in a week when auditors had already flagged a rise in exploit attempts across social channels.

Pseudonymous on-chain investigator Specter first flagged the Payy Network incident in a Telegram message, identifying suspicious withdrawals from the protocol's bridge to Ethereum. The attacker, funded via privacy protocol Railgun, swapped $1.8 million in USDC for ETH and drained the bridge's entire balance.

Payy confirmed the exploit on X and paused all operations, advising users against any further deposits until the firm completes its post-mortem. The team clarified that the drained funds were "users' non-custodial deposits to Payy Network/Payy Wallet." The firm has not yet disclosed the technical cause of the breach.

What does the Duelbits incident reveal about hot-wallet security?

Casino and sports betting operator Duelbits lost approximately $7 million in what observers characterized as a private key compromise. Blockchain security firm PeckShield initially tallied losses at $4.3 million, and Specter later revised the figure upward to $5.9 million after identifying affected addresses on Bitcoin and Solana.

Duelbits co-founder DuelbitsJoe set the final number at roughly $7 million in an X post. The platform lost $4.6 million in a 2024 incident that auditor CertiK also attributed to a private key compromise, making the September 25 breach the second key-management failure at the casino in under two years and raising fresh questions about the operator's custody architecture.

How did the Meter.io bridge fail?

Meter.io suffered a distinct attack vector. Rather than draining existing deposits, the attacker minted $2.3 million in unbacked tokens through a "block validation flaw," according to statements from the Meter.io team and on-chain analytics firm Blockaid. The attacker sold the tokens on PancakeSwap, crashing MTR by nearly 80% and MTRG by roughly 75%, per CoinMarketCap.

In an X post, the Meter.io team wrote: "we've preserved the chain state. The recovery method is still to be decided." Meter lost $4.4 million in a 2022 bridge exploit, marking its third cross-chain-related incident in four years and the second time a validator-related bug has produced token inflation.

What operational gaps does the cluster expose?

All three attacks targeted either bridge contracts or hot-wallet credentials, the two vulnerability classes that produced the largest single-day losses in DeFi throughout 2025 and 2026. None of the three teams has named a suspect, and only Payy and Meter have committed to public remediation timelines.

For Meter, recovery options now center on a community-approved chain restart or token migration, a process that typically spans several weeks and leaves holders exposed to secondary price dislocation and reduced liquidity on decentralized exchanges. Until the three protocols publish full post-mortems, the cluster will continue to pressure insurance pricing and bridge audit demand across the sector.

via protos.com (Original)

More from Marcus Bennett

Marcus Bennett

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering business strategy at Mempool Brief.

413 articles