0x58fcd31a58fc…58fcd317
US government moves $770M in seized Bitcoin to Coinbase Prime
The US government transferred 9,261 Bitcoin worth $770 million to Coinbase Prime over two days, per Galaxy Research, with 2,456 BTC from previously unknown holdings.

Outputs
9,261 BTC worth $770 million transferred to Coinbase Prime over two days
Galaxy Research attributes roughly half of the coins to the Bitfinex hackers
2,456 BTC originated from previously unknown holdings flagged as likely new seizures
Coinbase Prime has served as US Marshals Service custodian since 2024
March 2025 Trump executive order bars sale of seized Bitcoin for the Strategic Reserve
The US government transferred 9,261 Bitcoin valued at approximately $770 million to Coinbase Prime over a two-day window, according to on-chain analytics firm Galaxy Research.
Galaxy detailed the movements in a Thursday post on X. The firm attributed roughly half of the coins to recoveries from the Bitfinex hackers, with additional tranches linked to known Binance-related forfeiture cases.
A third segment of 2,456 BTC originated from previously unidentified holdings, Galaxy wrote, and may represent newly executed law enforcement seizures routed through the government's designated Coinbase Prime address.
What is the composition of the 9,261 BTC?
The total combines three identifiable streams. The single largest source traces to the Bitfinex exploit recovery, contributing roughly 4,600 BTC. A second portion stems from prior Binance seizures already visible on-chain. The remaining 2,456 BTC entered the government's seizure address without prior history, which led Galaxy to flag the funds as likely new enforcement actions.
Who custodies the seized assets?
Coinbase Prime has served as the custody provider for the US Marshals Service since 2024. The Marshals Service administers the disposition of crypto assets forfeited through federal criminal proceedings. Prior transfers from government-labeled wallets have consistently landed at Coinbase Prime addresses before any subsequent administrative steps.
In July, the government moved approximately $297 million in Bitcoin and Ether to the same venue, with those funds originating from historical federal crypto seizures.
Why consolidate without liquidating?
A March 2025 executive order from President Donald Trump directed that seized Bitcoin should not be sold and should instead be incorporated into a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. That directive creates a structural tension with the operational pattern of routing seized holdings through a custodian that historically has preceded dispositions.
Galaxy's analysis indicates that consolidation does not equal sale. Earlier large transfers from the government-labeled wallet sparked speculation about potential liquidations, but the executive order remains in force.
What does the 2,456 BTC signal about enforcement?
The previously unknown holdings point to ongoing or recently completed seizure operations that have not yet appeared in public forfeiture filings. Federal agencies file forfeiture actions in stages, and on-chain movements sometimes precede official case announcements.
Cointelegraph contacted the US Marshals Service and the Department of Justice for comment on the latest transfers. Neither agency responded before publication.
What are the market-structure consequences?
The continued use of Coinbase Prime concentrates custody with a single institutional prime brokerage, reducing the operational complexity of managing seized assets across venues. It also gives the government a regulated counterparty for any future disposition should policy shift.
For market participants, $770 million in BTC sitting at a single custodian represents a meaningful share of potential liquidation flow. Under current policy, those coins remain ring-fenced for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve rather than the open market.
The pattern of consolidation, custody, and restraint, combined with fresh inflows from previously unknown sources, points to reserve accumulation rather than preparation for sale. Any disbursement would depend on the executive order remaining in place, a court-ordered forfeiture distribution, or a shift in administration posture.
via x.com (Original)
More from Elena Vasquez
Show full bio
Staff writer covering marketplaces and e-commerce at Mempool Brief.
440 articles