0x016fdeca016f…016fdecd
Abracadabra Proposes Winding Down MIM at Roughly Four Cents
Abracadabra proposes winding down MIM, settling debts at roughly $0.0446 per token. The depegged stablecoin lost over 95% of peg value since its June slide from $0.74.
Outputs
Abracadabra proposes winding down MIM and settling obligations at roughly $0.0446 per token, a 95%-plus discount to the $1 peg
MIM fell from about $0.74 to $0.49–$0.50 in June 2026 as Bitcoin dropped below $60,000, and traded near $0.0446 by September
The protocol raised Cauldron interest rates, cut incentives, stopped Curve bribes and injected roughly $100,000 into a Curve pool in failed stabilization attempts
Abracadabra has put forward a proposal to wind down Magic Internet Money (MIM), its overcollateralized stablecoin, and settle outstanding obligations at the token's current market price of roughly $0.0446 — a 95%-plus discount to its intended $1 peg.
The move would leave holders of MIM, which once circulated with a market capitalization in the tens of millions of dollars, recovering approximately four cents on every dollar of face value. Self-reported data puts the current market cap at around $4.63 million, with circulating supply estimated between 55 million and 104 million tokens depending on the source and timing.
From depeg to wind-down
MIM's decline accelerated in June 2026, when the token fell sharply from around $0.74 to roughly $0.49–$0.50, driven in part by broader market turmoil as Bitcoin dropped below $60,000. The protocol's stabilization playbook followed a familiar pattern for DeFi crisis management: Abracadabra raised interest rates across its Cauldron lending markets to push borrowers to repay MIM-denominated debt and shrink circulating supply. It cut direct incentives and stopped paying Curve bribes — the liquidity mining rewards that had sustained MIM's peg through demand in Curve Finance pools.
The protocol also injected roughly $100,000 into a Curve pool in mid-June as a stabilization measure. Against a token with tens of millions in circulation, the injection proved ineffective. By September, MIM traded at approximately $0.0446.
A slow failure, not a sudden collapse
Abracadabra launched in 2021 during DeFi's expansion phase, offering a straightforward pitch: deposit yield-bearing crypto assets as collateral and mint MIM against them. The protocol expanded across multiple chains, built on deep Curve Finance integrations, and became a meaningful participant in Curve's stablecoin pools.
The protocol's structural fragility surfaced before. In January 2024, an exploit created bad debt on the platform and triggered a temporary depeg. MIM recovered then, but the episode demonstrated the core weakness of overcollateralized stablecoins: once confidence wavers, the mechanisms designed to maintain the peg can operate in reverse, accelerating outflows rather than stabilizing them.
MIM's final failure mode differs from Terra's UST implosion in 2022. Rather than a single catastrophic death spiral, MIM experienced a gradual loss of confidence that compounded over months until the peg became, in practical terms, fiction. When market conditions deteriorated, the collateral backing the token lost value at the same time demand for the stablecoin dried up. Rate hikes and liquidity-incentive cuts can theoretically reduce supply, but they also signal distress — prompting more holders to exit.
Operational consequences
The wind-down, if approved, would have knock-on effects across the protocol's ecosystem. The SPELL governance token, which powers Abracadabra's decision-making, faces an uncertain path: a protocol winding down its flagship product at pennies on the dollar offers little case for the token's future utility.
MIM's removal also takes a small but visible piece out of the Curve ecosystem. The stablecoin once held a meaningful share of Curve's stablecoin pools, and the loss of those positions and their associated gauge rewards reduces the breadth of that market structure.
For the wider DeFi sector, MIM's collapse adds another data point on the fragility of decentralized stablecoins. The failure illustrates that overcollateralization alone does not guarantee peg stability when collateral values and stablecoin demand fall in tandem — a risk profile that algorithmic and CDP-based designs share despite their mechanical differences.
Holders now face a stark choice: accept roughly $0.0446 per token under the proposed settlement terms or continue holding a token whose peg-maintenance mechanisms have effectively ceased to function. The proposal's passage through SPELL governance, and the final settlement mechanics for outstanding Cauldron debts, will determine how the remaining $4.6 million in market value gets distributed in the months ahead.
via Crypto Briefing (Source)